Under normal circumstances, the epithelial cell turnover rate from the intestine is 16 approximately?days [18], 3C4 period than that in rats much longer, which 4C5?times [1]
Under normal circumstances, the epithelial cell turnover rate from the intestine is 16 approximately?days [18], 3C4 period than that in rats much longer, which 4C5?times [1]. and eosin. The frogs had been given for (R)-Baclofen 22?times (Schematically illustrated framework from the intestine with morphological variables measured (see Desk?1). The in each (epitherial level, goblet cell, lumen, muscularis externa, trough, villus. 500?m in and Intestine homogenates (60?g protein; two examples/each group) had been examined by SDS-PAGE, accompanied Itga2 by Traditional western blotting. Music group intensities had been analyzed and portrayed in accordance with -tubulin, and beliefs are expressed in accordance with the value from the given frog (provided are mean??SEM (indicate significant differences between groupings (intestine was functionally suppressed by fasting which some genes respond quickly with refeeding for 1?time, although 1?time of refeeding isn’t enough for a few genes to totally get over the transcriptional down-regulation as a result of 3?weeks of fasting. Open up in another home window Fig.?3 Change transcription-quantitative polymerase string response (RT-qPCR) analysis of gene transcripts in the intestines of fed, refed and fasted indicated fold shifts of gene expression. The info of the entire name from the genes examined, the precise fold adjustments, SEM and statistic evaluation are proven in Additional document 2: Desk S1. These tests had been repeated at least 2 times, with equivalent outcomes Out of 22 genes involved in digestive or absorptive function of the intestine, 19 genes were down-regulated by fasting. In the refed frogs, the expression levels of at least 7 genes (cd36, slc5a1.2, alpi1, alpi2, mgam, nts, and gip) remained low, and the expression levels of the others (fabp1, fabp2, fabp6, rbp2, slc2a5, slc15a1, slc16a3, anpep, vip, glp1, glp1r and vil1) recovered to variable extents. Such an expression pattern was also detected in other categories. In the category of apoptosis, caspase genes (casp1, casp3, casp7, casp8 and casp9) were down-regulated by fasting and their expression levels still remained low 1?day after refeeding. In the category of proliferation, the expression levels of all genes were down-regulated by fasting and partially recovered by refeeding. In the category of regulation of gene expression, all but four genes (thrb, ppard, rarb and rarg) were down-regulated by fasting and variably recovered by refeeding. All but the g6pc1 gene in the category of metabolism were (R)-Baclofen down-regulated by fasting, and variably recovered by refeeding. The genes whose expression was quickly recovered nearly completely or up-regulated by 1-day refeeding were fabp1, fabp2, fabp6, rbp2, nos1, raptor, pcna, fxr, cdx2, ppargc1a, ppara, rara, pdk4, g6pc2, hmgcr, acadvl and lgr5. Conversely, the genes whose expression were not down-regulated by fasting and then recovered to the fed state levels (R)-Baclofen or down-regulated by refeeding were fgf19, thrb, rarb, rarg and mex3a. Epigenetic changes of fasting- and refeeding-response genes in intestine The fabp1, fabp2, cdx2 and fxr genes were selected for ChIP analysis as typical genes showing the down-regulation by fasting and the quick recovery by refeeding (Fig.?3). Our ChIP analysis revealed that these genes became epigenetically activated in the intestines with fasting and deactivated with refeeding (Figs.?4, ?,5),5), which had an inverse relationship with the transcript levels of these genes estimated by RT-qPCR (Fig.?6A). Open in a separate window Fig.?4 Epigenetic modifications on fabp1, fabp2, cdx2 and fxr genes in the intestines of fed, fasted and refed denote significantly different means (denote significantly different means (and and and and fxr (and denote significantly different means (intestine responds to fasting and refeeding at epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional levels, resulting in changes in the structure of the epithelial layer, intestinal specific functions, metabolism, and probably cell growth and differentiation. The remarkable features in the responses of the intestine to fasting and refeeding are (1) an overall suppression and quick recovery of the transcription of genes associated with intestinal functions, as well as those of the epithelial layer structure, (R)-Baclofen and (R)-Baclofen (2) the discordance between the mRNA amounts (low when fasting and high when refeeding) and the states of epigenetic marks (an activated state when fasting and a basal state when refeeding) in the diet-response genes fabp1, fabp2, cdx2 and fxr. These features suggest that the intestine has a mechanism by which, when fasting, the metabolic rate is suppressed at least through the transcriptional down-regulation of almost all of the genes to conserve energy, whereas, if once the frogs intake food, intestinal mass and functions can quickly recover to those of the fed state by epigenetic and/or post-transcriptional mechanisms, maintaining a standby mode during fasting periods. Structure of intestinal mucosa and gene expression Our histological observations indicate that fasting and refeeding profoundly affect the structure of the mucosa where the epithelial cell differentiation, proliferation or apoptosis may be reduced with.